Azog, one of the many examples of how this series was padded out
to mixed results.
In many ways The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies is a hard film to review. Fans of middle earth are going to swarm to the film regardless of what any review contains, and for good reason. The original trilogy easily contains some of the best, if not the very best fantasy films made. The Hobbit trilogy in comparison has widely thus far been considered good albeit disappointing.
The Battle of Five
armies starts of where The Desolation of Smaug ends, a film that
sadly and amusingly didn't contain the actual desolation of Smaug.
Instead it was used as bait to entice viewers to see this presumably
final film of Peter Jackson middle earth saga. As a result The Battle
of Five armies has an expectedly exciting opening. Although those who
where less then impressed by the more cartoon like action of The
Hobbit will continue to be unimpressed. Characters from the outset
continue to do impossible things, At times this is fine as it is well
established in the films that Elves are capable of what are
seemingly impossible feats for a human. However this film as the
prior two Hobbit films extends this to both the human characters and
dwarves. This once again robs the film of their being any sense of
risk for the characters present, which undermines the entire epic
finale and battle between five armies.
That isn't to say the
film as a finale isn't satisfyingly epic. It just is a film that seem
to undercut its intentions for little reason beyond Peter Jackson an
co thinking a certain moment may look 'cool', much like Michael Bay
seemingly has done with the Transformer films. However compared to
the previous instalments such silliness is kept to a relative minimum
and thus allows some room for emotional weight. However with a few
exceptions such as Bilbo, Gandalf and Thranduil who all have
exceptional acting behind them, their is little reasons to care about
what happens. This is particularly problematic when it comes to the
dwarves of which less then half contain anything resembling a
character beyond a caricature. Giving that the entire trilogy is
about the Dwarves reclaiming their home this is a particular
problem that undermines the purpose of the entire trilogy.
With that being said the
performances of those that you do care about that the finale does
provide for just enough context to provide some emotional punch and to bring this middle earth saga to a satisfying if not disappointing conclusion. The
film is also the shortest of the trilogy and whilst a few areas are
left with little resolution this decreased run time is largely
welcome and removes the bloat that plagued the first two Hobbit films
where it was abundantly obvious that their simply wasn't enough
content to sustain an entire trilogy.
Whilst it is far from a
masterpiece The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies is a film that is certainly easy to recommend to fans of the Hobbit films. It also has reduced the issues present in the previous two films to a large enough degree to come recommended thanks largely to it slightly less absurd action and its
tighter pacing without the bloat that plagued the first two entries
of this trilogy.
Whilst it isn't the defining chapter as marketing would have you believe it
is certainly the most enjoyable of the Hobbit films.
What about he HFR? Well
I may be somewhat cheating here as this is largely a direct copy of
what I wrote last year regarding the HFR in The Desolation of Smaug. It however remains as relevant for this film as it was the last. The
short story is I would highly recommend viewing it in HFR, for more
detail please read the below.
Whilst more a comment
on the technical side I fell compelled to mention the films use of
HFR. This is especially the case as The Battle of Five Armies, The
Desolation of Smaug and An Unexpected Journey are the only films with
a wide release to be shoot and be viewable in such a way. HFR simply
stands for high frame rate and as was the case with the prior two
films The Battle of Five Armies has been filmed in HFR at 48fps as
opposed to the usual 24fps (meaning the number of images a displayed
every second is doubled when compared to more or less every other
film that has ever been release [there are some exceptions of course,
most notably with older silent films before 24fps became the used
‘standard’]). I simply cannot say enough good things about the
use of HFR, it provides for a very surreal presentation with
everything appearing extremely smooth and lifelike. Likewise the use
of 3d especially when combined with the films use of HFR is equally
impressive and well worth the extra cost of admission for those
interested in seeing this film. The only down side to HFR is it can
make the at times less then stellar production values extremely
evident. This is of particular note as the entire Hobbit trillogy is
extremely inconsistent with it use of cgi. Most scene do look
spectacular but on occasion the use of cgi is overly evident and
looks more like what one may expect from a film released well over a
decade ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment